Welcome from David Rhoads!

david

Welcome to our blog. Its purpose is to promote discussion between us (Rhoads Associates) and you (our users) on topics relevant to clinical laboratory quality issues and/or EP Evaluator. Our goal is to publish at least one new article each month, and to monitor the forum and respond to user’s questions promptly.

We want your feedback! It’s easy. Registration is not required. For example, use the search box to search for topics you are interested in. We will watch what users search for, and try to add content on those topics. Many of the articles have a rating box at the bottom. To rate an article, just move your mouse over the stars and click. You can also leave a comment in the comment box.

Want to network with other EP Evaluator users? Participate in the FORUMS. Post questions and discussion topics. Answer questions from other users. Get notified by email when a response is posted.

Want more tips on how to get the most from our blog? Visit the HELP page.

We look forward to your feedback, thoughts, and comments. After all, the purpose of our software is to help you stay on top of your Quality Assurance issues.

dgr2

David G. Rhoads
President

What would you like to see in EP Evaluator Release 9?

We are now planning EP Evaluator 9, scheduled for release at AACC 2009. Our goal is to add at least three new statistical modules or major features. Here are some enhancement candidates. What would you like to see? »more…

Recent changes to the Incident Tracking Module

Significant changes were made to Incident Tracking in spring 2008 (EE8, builds 100 and 103). The biggest change you will see is that, after upgrading to Build 100 you will be asked for a user id and password each time you run Incident Tracking. On first use, enter an id of admin, and leave the password blank. Then choose File / Administer Users from the menu to assign users and passwords. If you don’t want to set up a user list, simply instruct all users to enter an id of admin and leave the password blank. Other changes are summarized below. »more…

Two Instrument Comparison - the easy way to show that two instruments give clinically equivalent results.

The Two Instrument Comparison (2IC) module, introduced in EP Evaluator Release 7, is made-to-order for semi-annual comparison of in-service instruments. You get a pass/fail answer, with no slopes, intercepts, or correlation coefficients to interpret. »more…

The Magic of Paste

How much time do you spend typing experimental results into EP Evaluator? Do you already have those same results in Excel? If you do, there may be an easier, faster, and more reliable way – copy from Excel, paste to EP Evaluator. »more…

Quality Assurance at Rhoads Associates

Rhoads Associates is strongly committed to providing a quality product at a reasonable price. Our quality approach has two central themes: experience, and testing. »more…

Hemostasis User Tip: APTT Reference Interval

A task that is often performed in Hemostasis labs is definition of the reference interval for APTT based on a linear regression evaluation relative to heparin concentrations. It is similar in many ways to a method comparison evaluation but is different in several significant ways. This can be done easily using EP Evaluator as follows: »more…

What’s Our IQ?

No, this isn’t about how smart Rhoads Associates is. In the Quality Management world, IQ isn’t Intelligence Quotient. It’s an acronym for Installation Qualification. Installation Qualification “ensures that an instrument is received as designed and specified. It documents the installation in the selected user environment.” In this case, the instrument in question is EP Evaluator (EE). This article is targeted more to the Information Technology staff than to the end user. It addresses
»more…